Archive for October, 2009

The Six Thinking Hats

Friday, October 16th, 2009 by cindyedmonds

Someone tipped me off last year to a really useful technique. It may be one of those things that the rest of the world was aware of and I have been under a rock and missed it but in case there are some fellow rock-dwellers reading this blog I’m going to share the epiphany here. I’ve been working on a new business proposition over the past couple of weeks where it has been incredibly useful to apply this technique: Edward De Bono’s Six Thinking Hats.

The premise is that we all have a natural or preferred thinking style. For example, my thinking style is quite critical and ‘nit-picking’ whereas one of my colleagues is more optimistic and grandiose. When considering new business investments we need to apply both styles of thinking (and more) to the proposition to ensure we cover all bases. I’m sure everyone has worked with someone who you dread having a meeting with because they’re so negative or obstructive? I’m not saying I work with anyone like that right now but I have in the past and as a Project Manager it is imperative that I get the outcomes that I need from meetings and the Six Thinking Hats is a great enabler for this. (I have copied the following definitions from wikipedia)

  • Neutrality (White) - considering purely what information is available, what are the facts?
  • Feeling (Red) - instinctive gut reaction or statements of emotional feeling (but not any justification)
  • Negative judgement (Black) - logic applied to identifying flaws or barriers, seeking mismatch
  • Positive Judgement (Yellow) - logic applied to identifying benefits, seeking harmony
  • Creative thinking (Green) - statements of provocation and investigation, seeing where a thought goes
  • Process control (Blue) - thinking about thinking

Six Hats Thinking means that in meetings, for example, the team considers the issues while imaginatively or figuratively wearing each of the Six Hats in turn. Some people stay quiet during Green Hat as they can’t think that way and then jump in with enthusiasm during Black Hat. Genius!

Which Hat are you?

Agile in the Enterprise

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 by cindyedmonds

There is an exciting shift in the Project Management world from focussing on teams to moving our attention to the Enterprise. I am very excited about this because over time as a Project Manager you realise that you can arm yourself with skills, knowledge, certification and techniques and you can lead your teams and equip them with knowledge and freedom to work in a focussed and directed way and still hit obstacles that invariably lead back to the organisation. Both Prince2 and Agile practitioners are starting to think about how to address the organisational issues and how to scale methodologies to the enterprise.

Last week at Valtech’s Agile Edge conference Al Goerner gave a terrific key note session on Adapting Agile to the Enterprise. In explaining the maturing of Agile practice he outlined the two generations of Agile:

1st Generation - Agile for the team

  • Emphasising the Human Factors in development
  • Emphasising Empowerment-to-a-goal
  • A Gaggle of Gurus
  • Naive Agile and Faux Agile

2nd Generation - Agile for the Enterprise

  • Emphasising Risk Management
  • Emphasising Backlog Management
  • Emphasising Visibility and Accountability
  • Emphasising the Whole Solution Value Stream

The 2nd Generation of Agile practices really resonates with me and I’m sure resonates with any Project Manager who has worked in large organisations. How many of us have wrangled with the 1st Generation ‘Gaggle of Gurus’? :-) I certainly have!

Managing risk and providing visibility and accountability is so important in the enterprise and I’m completely inspired by Al Goerner’s presentation on exactly these issues. His most important point was that Agile doesn’t mean not focussing on these things and it doesn’t mean not producing documentation and certain other claims made by the 1st Generation-ers. The key thing is to only do things that have a point, that will be read, and not just as a formality or because they’re ‘required’.

Beam me up Scotty!